Cookie Clicker
Orteil · Horror, Indie, Idler
Overview
An idle game about making cookies! Originally released in 2013 on the web, and actively developed since then. This is the official version for Steam.
Read moreShow less
Cookie Clicker is a game about making an absurd amount of cookies. To help you in this endeavor, you will recruit a wide variety of helpful cookie makers, like friendly Grandmas, Farms, Factories, and otherworldly Portals.
Cookie Clicker was originally released in 2013, but has been very actively developed since then. If you played it before, try it again to see all the new features!
- Collect cookies and spend them to earn even more cookies
- Over 600+ upgrades
- Over 500+ Achievements
- Pet your dragon
- Mini-games
- Unlock heavenly perma-upgrades
- Cloud saving (no more deleting cookies by accident)
- Music by C418
- Play community-made mods through Steam workshop
From the game's Steam store page.
THE GAMEQ VERDICT9,999 reviews analyzed
What players are actually saying
1. Summary
Much of the praise is about how far a joke premise goes: buildings turn into ascension resets, a garden, spells, a pantheon, a stock market, a dragon, and a grandma storyline that slides into cosmic horror, all wrapped in writing people find funny. Some call it the idle game that started it all. They call it addictive too, mostly in mock warnings ("it will ruin your life"), and plenty leave it running in the background while they do other things. Reviewers who discuss the purchase say they paid for the Steam version's extras (achievements, cloud saves, Workshop mods, and a soundtrack they credit to C418), often on top of a game they already played free in a browser, and several bought it mainly to support the developer.
Pacing draws more of the complaints than anything else. In the longer negative reviews, words like slow, grind, tedious or boring show up in 33%. Long-time players describe a more specific problem: after a few ascensions, progress depends on lining up golden cookie combos, which turns play into waiting for luck. Finishing every achievement is described as a job of months, or for some years. A smaller group objects to paying for a Steam build that reviewers in 2026 reported as older than the free browser version and unable to import newer browser saves, and a few report no offline production, visual bugs or lost saves. Reviewers who bring up the price usually call it good value; where they split is whether the slow late game is the point or a flaw.
2. What keeps coming up
What players praise
A silly premise that keeps opening upHigh
Underneath the cookie, reviewers find far more game than the premise suggests. 11% of the longer reviews talk about its later systems: ascension and heavenly upgrades, the garden, the grimoire's spells, the pantheon, the stock market and the dragon. One reviewer traces the arc: "What begins as a brainless idle clicker slowly reveals mini games like the garden, pantheon worship, wizard spells, and the eldritch horror of the Grandmapocalypse." Fans like that each layer gives optimisers something new to plan around.
The minigames themselves divide people. One player says the game "starts to get really good" once the stock market and the garden open up, another ends an otherwise warm review with "Hate the stock market", and a negative review calls the garden "extremely complicated and an EXTREME amount of waiting and luck". Negative reviews that mention these systems mostly come from players who reached them and found them slow.
Hard to put downHigh
11% of the longer reviews call the game addictive or say it hooked them, and the word turns up in hundreds of shorter reviews too. Most of it is a joke: reviewers warn others to stay away, list the relationships the cookie cost them, and then vote thumbs up. Some thumbs-down reviews do the same, posting mock addiction warnings while clearly enjoying the game. A few negative reviewers mean it seriously and describe a compulsion loop that kept them playing without fun: "It isn't fun, but it'll keep you playing."
Funny writing and grandma loreMedium
The humour gets steady credit, from the news ticker and the building and upgrade descriptions to the grandmapocalypse, where the grandmas become a hive mind. "The humor in the building descriptions and news ticker is great," one player writes, and another says "The sprite work is incredible, and the added humor is quite sharp." Some read the escalation from bakery to interdimensional cookie empire as satire of endless growth. A small number find the late-game grandma art unsettling, and one reviewer mentions an option for the scary visuals.
A calm game to leave runningMedium
9% of the longer reviews describe it as a background, second-monitor or relaxing game, something to check between other tasks: "i leave this game running while drawing and stop to make upgrades occasionally, it is incredibly calming." Plenty of positive reviews describe playing it this way, with golden cookies as the reason to glance back: "Golden cookies popping up are a nice little reward for actually paying attention."
Seen as the genre's originalMedium
Some reviewers call it the OG or the grandfather of idle games, or say it started it all, and some first played it in a browser at school ("Everybody has played this game at least once on a school chromebook."). For these players, buying it on Steam is partly nostalgia and partly a thank-you. A minority use the same label against it: it may be the original, they say, but newer idle games have moved past it (see the frustrations below).
The C418 soundtrackLow
Reviewers single out the Steam version's music, which they credit to C418, the composer known for Minecraft, as calming and as one of the extras that justify buying the Steam edition over the free browser game. One long-time player's caveat is repetition over long sessions: "There is only ONE song."
Where players are split
Slow by design, or just slow?High
13% of the longer reviews use words like slow, grind, tedious or boring, and among the longer negative ones that rises to 33%. Defenders see the slowness as deliberate: "Cookie Clicker's gameplay is intentionally made slow in order to create a longer, more drawn out experience." Others describe a slow opening that pays off later: "really boring for the first 3-4 days of playing it, but once you hit your first ascension things start accelerating exponentially". Players who quit early say nothing interesting happens for days and the first ascension feels out of reach. Players who stay on report a second wall later, where upgrades cost far more and each one adds a few percent.
Hundreds of achievements, and a brutal 100%High
Achievements come up in 15% of the longer reviews. The Steam list (over 600 achievements, by reviewers' counts) is a common reason people give for buying this version, and collecting them is a favourite long-term goal. Finishing it is harder to love: 4% of the longer reviews describe 100% completion as absurd, months-long or not worth attempting, citing the achievement for clicking 27,777 golden cookies, levelling every building with sugar lumps, shadow achievements counted on Steam, and pure-luck unlocks. One veteran puts it as "it's just waiting for a png to appear 25k+ times after 2+ minutes each". Several completionists say they finished with mods or the in-game cheat console, and a few post save codes that unlock every achievement at once. One reviewer also reports achievements not updating when the game was played with Steam closed.
Paying for a game that is free in the browserMedium
The Steam version sits next to an official free browser version, and reviewers weigh that openly. Many who raise it list what the Steam edition adds ("Since the game is free on the web, you're mainly paying for Workshop support, Steam Cloud saves, the soundtrack, and Steam achievements.") or say they bought it to support the developer ("The Steam version adds achievements and cloud saves, making it worth picking up to support the developer."). The low price comes up repeatedly as good value for the hours. Not every buyer knew about the free version beforehand: "Also, web is free. Didn't realize that when I bought this version." Pointing to the free version is proportionally more common in negative reviews, where it usually comes paired with the outdated Steam build described below.
Mods, autoclickers and cheatsMedium
Workshop mods, autoclickers and cheats come up in 6.5% of the longer reviews. For some players they rescue the game: one installed an autoclicker mod and wrote, "That immediately made the game much more fun for me", and a few recommend Workshop mods for working out what to buy next. Critics ask what is left of the game once mods do the work: "If an idle game has mods that literally play the game for you, what's the point?"
What frustrates players
The late game waits on golden cookie luckMedium
Long-time players describe a specific late-game problem. After a few ascensions, they say, progress stops coming from buildings and upgrades and comes almost entirely from stacking golden cookie buffs, spells and building effects into short combos. One negative review lays it out: "meaningful progress becomes almost completely dependent on Golden Cookie combos." Another calls the late game "a simulator of getting extremely lucky in comboing the golden cookie multipliers". Golden cookies or combos come up in 11% of the longer negative reviews. The complaint also appears in positive reviews, several of which list combo-dependent progress as a drawback, while a few other positive reviewers enjoy chasing and planning combos.
Newer idle games do it betterLow
A recurring minority view, mostly from reviewers who arrived from other incremental games, is that Cookie Clicker has aged. 9% of the longer negative reviews compare it unfavourably to newer or other idle games, naming titles such as Antimatter Dimensions, Trimps and Tower Wizard, saying those offer more decisions and faster progress. Their complaint is that early play lacks interesting choices ("Each subsequent unlock was just a different cookie-generator") and that "both the incremental and idle aspects are excrutiatingly slow".
The Steam build trails the browser versionLow
By reviewers' account in 2026, the Steam version had fallen behind the browser version; one buyer reports "Steam version is v.2.053 Browser version is v.2.058". Several who bought on Steam after years on the web, some of them to support the developer, say their newer browser saves would not import. One negative review sums it up: "Why did i pay for worse cookie clicker than the free one." An older review in the slice made the same complaint about the Steam build lagging behind, and a few reviewers ask directly for it to be updated.
Little offline progressLow
A handful of players are surprised that cookies do not build up while the game is closed until an ascension upgrade unlocks limited offline production: "Cookies do not progress offline, you have to keep the game open in the background. Very strange decision for an idle game of this genre." They say this means leaving the game open for long stretches.
Visual bugs, freezes and lost savesLow
Technical complaints are few and come mostly from negative reviews: graphics bugging out, stutters on alt-tab, the game launching fullscreen no matter the setting, and the cursor clicking through the window. A few players say long-running saves reset or were erased and that Steam Cloud could not bring them back ("DO NOT RELY ON STEAM CLOUD BACKUP"). One reviewer with a visual disability adds: "The font size is extremely small, and there is no way to increase it."
3. The player conversation
The conversation is playful and very positive. Most reviews are one line long, and a large share are jokes: cookie spam, mock confessions of ruined lives, and thumbs-down warnings from people who love the game. A smaller group of longer reviews holds the real debate, and it is narrow. Those reviews rarely fault the writing or the humour; the argument is over how much waiting is fair.
Who raises what follows the game's stages. Reviewers who quit early, and players arriving from newer incremental games, say the opening is slow and short on decisions. Long-time players, often after several ascensions or a 100% attempt, raise the late-game reliance on golden cookie combos, the sugar lump bottleneck and the hardest achievements, and some of them still recommend it. Steam-version complaints (outdated build, save import, paying for a free game) come mostly from returning browser players. Across the weeks in the slice from August 2025 on, the positive share stayed between about 91% and 98% with no lasting shift.
4. What the developers could do
- Give the late game routes forward that don't depend on perfect golden cookie combos. Long-time players say progress after a few ascensions comes almost entirely from luck-based combos, turning play into waiting.
- Trim the most extreme completion requirements. The 27,777 golden cookie achievement, sugar lump costs and pure-luck unlocks push completionists into cheats or mods, and several warn others not to attempt 100%.
- Bring the Steam build level with the browser version and keep saves portable. Reviewers who bought on Steam to support the developer report an older version that will not import their newer browser saves, and one of them says they will ask for a refund.
- Fix the visual and UI glitches, alt-tab freezes and forced fullscreen, and make cloud saves reliable. Each of these comes from negative reviews, and a reset save that Steam Cloud could not restore ended at least one long run.
- Unlock offline production earlier or make it stronger. Players new to the game call it strange that an idle game needs to stay open for cookies to accumulate.
- Build in the purchase and statistics helpers players install mods for. Reviewers recommend Workshop mods to work out the best next purchase, and one wrote that this could have been a feature in the game.
- Add a text size option. A reviewer with a visual disability could not read upgrade descriptions at the fixed font size.
