Full ReleaseXbox · PC · PlayStation

Naraka: Bladepoint

24 Entertainment · Fighting, Survival, Action

Overview

Dive into the legends of the Far East in NARAKA: BLADEPOINT; team up with friends in fast-paced melee fights for a Battle Royale experience unlike any other. Find your playstyle with a varied cast of heroes with unique skills. More than 40 million players have already joined the fray, play free now!

Read more

Dynamic, fast-paced and ever shifting; battle your enemies with punishing combos, parries and grit or outsmart them using lethal counters in an intense mind game.

Wall run, swoop down, and zip across mountains and buildings with ease as you hunt down unsuspecting foes using your grappling hook and parkour skills.

Combine a variety of melee and ranged weapons with our cast of powerful heroes, each with customized skills and unique Ultimate moves.

Travel to the magnificent but dangerous land of Morus and Holoroth, where great battles have shaped a beautiful landscape inspired by Far Eastern legends.

From the game's Steam store page.

THE GAMEQ VERDICT9,998 reviews analyzed

What players are actually saying

A deep, skill-driven melee battle royale with no real rival, dragged down by ping, bot-padded lobbies and brutal matchmaking jumps.

73% positive on Steam · 303,221 reviews

1. Summary

NARAKA: BLADEPOINT is a melee battle royale, and the combat is what players come for: a rock-paper-scissors core of light attacks, charged "blue focus" attacks and disarming parries, with weapon-specific combos, soul jades, hero abilities and a grappling hook on top that turns chases and escapes into something out of a wuxia film. Reviewers who stay with it describe a fighting game dropped into a battle royale, and players past 1,000 hours write that they are still learning. The look gets nearly as much attention, from the maps and outfits to a face editor detailed enough that players share their presets. Going free-to-play made it an easy suggestion for some ("it is free, give it a try"), and the PvE Showdown mode, bot mode and trios with friends give casual players a way in.

What players complain about is mostly what surrounds the combat. Outside Asia, ping and desync decide parries and combos, lobbies below Solar rank are padded with bots (some of which parry perfectly), and players who climb past them meet the same handful of top-ranked veterans after long queues. Cheaters and auto-parry scripts, hero power creep, stun-lock combos, gacha-heavy cosmetics, poor optimization, huge patches and a cluttered, pop-up-heavy menu fill out the list. Negative reviewers with under two hours played most often name the anti-cheat's demand to switch off Windows memory integrity. Veterans keep recommending the game while listing grievances that have gone unfixed for years.

2. What keeps coming up

What players praise
Deep, skill-based melee combat unlike any other battle royaleHigh

Combat is the most common topic in the reviews, raised in 30% of reviews with real text. Players describe the rock-paper-scissors core (light beats parry, charged beats light, parry beats charged and knocks the weapon out of the enemy's hands) as easy to grasp and deep enough to keep learning for years, with feints, cancels, grapple extensions and weapon-specific combos on top. Sekiro, For Honor, Gunz, Tekken and Dark Souls PvP come up as comparisons in 76 reviews. Some players who say they normally avoid battle royales make an exception for this one because the fighting is melee, and one explains the appeal: "when you die, you actually feel like you were supposed to die." A veteran lists "1300 hours in and still learning new tricks" among the game's strengths. Negative reviews rarely fault the combat itself. At least 17 praise it on the way to other complaints, as in "Great combat mechanics, but buried under repetitive gameplay and aggressive monetization," while 2 call it clunky. The same depth is behind the learning-curve and stun-lock complaints covered below.

Visuals, character customization and cosmetic designHigh

The East Asian fantasy maps, the animations and the art direction all get praise, and the character customization gets the most: the face editor lets players sculpt anything from an idealized waifu to "Shrek" or "Squidward," and presets can be shared. Outfit and weapon-skin design is praised even by players who hate how those cosmetics are sold, and some name the collaborations (NieR: Automata, The Witcher, Persona) as highlights. Dozens of positive reviews say, often in a single line, how attractive the characters are. A few players find the art style "like a mobile game" or dislike mecha and sci-fi additions that clash with the wuxia setting.

Movement and the grappling hookMedium

Chasing someone across rooftops, escaping a bad fight or dropping onto an enemy from above "never gets old," and the grappling hook, wall-running and climbing get praise of their own. A few players compare the movement to Titanfall or Attack on Titan, and veterans count movement tech as part of the skill ceiling. A couple of reviews say parkour snags on geometry and leaves characters stuck in textures.

Breadth of content: Showdown PvE, bot mode and side modesMedium

Players who expected a pure battle royale find more: Showdown, a souls-like PvE boss and roguelite mode that a couple of long-time players say could be its own game, a bot mode that grants full progression for players who never want PvP, Bloodbath deathmatch, the capture-point mode, the extraction mode, and a social hub with duels and playable instruments while queuing. The criticism is mostly about access. Some modes open only on weekends or at set times, low-population modes (Doom Domain, the easy Rift Traversal path) can fail to fill, some Showdown content is locked to trios, and a few veterans want the effort put back into the core battle royale instead.

Best with friendsMedium

Several reviews say the game is best played in trios with a regular group ("Best with friends," one says). Solo players describe the other side in negative reviews: random teammates who go off alone, quit the moment they die, or never communicate.

Where players are split
The learning curve and skill ceilingMedium

Reviewers agree the game is hard and disagree about whether that is its best feature or its fatal flaw. Recommending reviewers call it "easy to learn, hard to master," say every loss teaches something, and treat getting "humbled" as part of the charm. Critics say the tutorial covers the basics but leaves out the mechanics that decide fights (animation cancels, repair dodges, grapple combos), which players end up learning from YouTube, and that the game becomes a "second job." Early quitters describe the controls as clunky or unresponsive and say their first real opponents comboed them to death.

Hero balance, power creep and stun-lock combosMedium

Complaints about balance outnumber praise: about 100 reviews call heroes or weapons overpowered, unbalanced or due a nerf, against fewer than 30 that call the balance fair. The complaints say new heroes launch overpowered to sell their cosmetics, that transformation ultimates and win-button ultimates let players skip the rock-paper-scissors core, and that reworks removed abilities people had spent hundreds of hours learning (Tarka Ji's rework and Valda Cui's lost abilities are named). Tessa's ultimate, Inor, Yexiu, flying knives and dual halberds also draw complaints. Stun-locks and air juggles get their own: newer players describe being comboed "100 to 0" with no counterplay, while veterans reply that escapes exist (combo breakers, specific skills) and call it a skill issue. One long-time player writes that since January 2026 "Balance changes have become more consistent."

Cosmetic monetization: generous for free players, brutal for collectorsMedium

Reviews that bring up pay-to-win almost all say the game isn't, and many free players are happy with how much they earn from events and with a battle pass that refunds enough gold to buy the next one. The complaints are about how the best cosmetics are sold: loot-box "treasures" with low odds, duplicates that convert to near-worthless currency, a one-time pity at 100 pulls, limited-run extreme skins, hairstyles and dye behind paywalls, two separate battle passes, and heavy FOMO. Several spenders report spending hundreds or thousands of dollars without getting the item they wanted, and a handful mention region-locked bundles or expiring currency. One review welcomes a later "Targeted Guarantee" event.

What frustrates players
Ping, desync and unstable serversHigh

Network problems come up in 13% of reviews with real text. Players describe a combat system built on frame-tight timing that falls apart over the network: parries that flash red but do not register, hits that land through a dodge, lag spikes and disconnects mid-fight, and a reconnect flow that dumps them on an "account error" screen and forces a restart. Players far from the few server locations (Oceania, South America, the Middle East, India, South Africa, Central Asia) say combos and parries turn into guesswork above roughly 100 ms. On EU and NA servers the recurring grievance is opponents from other regions with very high ping who are hard to hit, and 18 reviews mention or ask for a region lock or ping cap. A few veterans add that animation speed scales with frame rate, so a faster CPU wins exchanges. Most of these reviews come from veterans, with a median of 97 hours.

Bot-filled lobbiesHigh

Bots come up in 11% of reviews with real text. New players on non-Asian servers report winning their first matches and then realizing nearly every opponent was a bot, with bots filling quick play and even ranked lobbies until roughly Platinum or Solar; a few call the player count fake. How the bots fight draws its own complaints: easy bots walk into walls, while hard and high-rank bots parry every charged attack with inhuman timing, gang up on players and appear with full gear. Some players defend bots as a gentle on-ramp and use bot mode to practice. Others want fewer bots in competitive matches, none in ranked, or, as one review asks, "Bots being marked as bots."

Matchmaking that jumps from bots to top-100 playersHigh

After coasting through bot lobbies, players around Platinum and Solar are matched into "champion" lobbies of top-ranked veterans, sometimes 400 or more rating points above them, and are eliminated before they land a hit. Players say there is "no middle ground" to learn in and that they meet the same few top players every match, while smurf accounts and server-hopping veterans make low-rank and casual lobbies worse. One veteran notes that ranked points are so lenient "it is really easy to hit Plat+," so nearly everyone ends up in those lobbies regardless of skill. Most of these complaints come from players with 50 or more hours.

Cheaters, scripts and weak reportingMedium

Cheating comes up in 8% of reviews with real text. Players describe auto-parry and auto-combo scripts, stagger immunity, wallhacks and teleporting, plus teaming in solo queues, and say reporting is too hard: there is no way to report from a match replay, support asks for video evidence, and nothing visible happens afterward. The developers' weekly ban lists are cited both as proof of effort and as proof of how many cheaters there are. A few veterans with thousands of hours dispute the scale (one has "rarely encountered obvious cheaters") and say many suspected cheaters are simply skilled or low-ping players.

The anti-cheat's security demandsMedium

The anti-cheat asks players to disable Windows memory integrity (HVCI) or core isolation, and the most upvoted negative reviews in the slice are about exactly that: 10 of the 12 most upvoted. Twenty-two reviews repeat nearly the same sentence, that the game asks you to "disable HVCI which protects your kernal memory from having malicious code inserted." Many of these players refuse and uninstall within minutes, and some call the game spyware. About a third of the reviews raising the anti-cheat come from players under two hours. The reviews disagree on the facts: several players, including multi-thousand-hour veterans, say the requirement was removed or only appears on certain setups, while others report still seeing the prompt, security software flagging the anti-cheat driver, or being unable to remove it after uninstalling. Waves of these reviews appear from late 2023 through 2025.

Thin western population and long queuesMedium

Outside Asia, players say the game feels empty: ranked queues of 10 to 30 minutes above Solar, queues that time out outside peak hours, PvE and side modes that never fill, and NA and EU leaderboards that feel like a small circle of regulars. A few blame the lack of western marketing; one recommending player wishes the game could "receive some proper marketing in the west." A few others point out that it is far more popular in China.

Optimization, crashes and huge patchesMedium

Stutter and frame drops in crowded fights, even on high-end hardware, lead the performance complaints, along with a CPU-bound engine that ignores graphics settings, heavy GPU load even in menus, crashes and freezes, games that hang on the "tap to start" screen, and an effective requirement for an SSD. Frequent patches of 10 to 30 GB that seem to re-download much of the game irritate players on slower connections, and some say specific updates made optimization worse. A minority report smooth performance, including on Linux and Steam Deck.

A cluttered, pop-up-heavy interfaceLow

Newer players in particular describe the menus as a maze: dozens of currencies, red notification dots, event and reward screens to click through, shop offers everywhere, and an "are you sure?" prompt on exit. Several compare it to a mobile game and say they spend more time in menus than in matches.

False bans, account problems and supportLow

A smaller group reports bans they say were wrong: triggered by leftover tools such as Cheat Engine, overlay or crosshair apps, internet cafes, or accounts hijacked by third parties, with appeals answered by automated or scripted replies. Some had bans lifted only after persistent tickets. Others describe unhelpful support over purchases and missing rewards, and players who spent money on Xbox or PlayStation resent the lack of cross-progression with Steam.

Early buyers who felt burned by the free-to-play switchLow

Some players who bought the game before it went free-to-play in 2023 want their money back or say the compensation was not enough. Others say the compensation gold was generous and that going free was the right call for the population.

Censored outfits and removed physicsLow

A small group objects to outfits being altered after purchase and to character physics being toned down, describing it as changing content they paid for.

3. The player conversation

Most reviews are short and positive, and the game-focused reviews are about 81% positive. The reviews with real substance are more critical (67.5% positive) and repeat the same complaints across years, often from players with hundreds or thousands of hours who say they love the combat and keep playing anyway. What negative reviewers object to changes with experience. Among players under two hours, the anti-cheat prompt is the problem named most often (54 of 395 negative reviews), ahead of ping, bots, performance and clunky controls. Among players past 50 hours, ping and servers lead (178 of 816 negative reviews), followed by cheating, bots, balance, matchmaking and monetization. A recurring defensive voice tells critics it is a skill issue, and a recurring counter-voice replies that ping and frame rate decide the fights.

Reviews written around the 2021 launch, when the game was a paid title with a cash shop, are the least positive (about 58% in the first weeks after launch). The free-to-play switch in mid-2023 brought a flood of new reviews that were broadly warmer, around 80% positive, alongside the first large waves of anti-cheat security complaints. Through 2024 and 2025 the tone settled into steady affection mixed with veteran disillusionment about power creep, a new map, the extraction mode and a western scene that felt empty, and one long-time player wrote that balance and updates improved from January 2026. The visible dip in summer 2026 is mostly the templated reviews noted above; the genuine reviews from that period stayed close to the long-run average.

4. What the developers could do

  1. Fix ping and server stability outside China. Players say parries, dodges and combos only work reliably in a narrow ping range, so more regional servers (Oceania, the Middle East, South America, India), ping-aware matchmaking or an optional region lock, a working mid-match reconnect, and removing the frame-rate dependence of animations would address the problem veterans raise most often in negative reviews.
  2. Smooth the jump from bot lobbies to top-ranked players. Players matched against top-100 veterans the moment they reach Platinum or Solar have nowhere to learn, so tighter rank bands, slower point gains and stronger smurf detection would give mid-level players room to improve.
  3. Make bots optional, labeled and human-like. New players feel deceived by bot-filled PvP and ranked lobbies and frustrated by bots that parry perfectly, so an opt-out (one player says Xbox already has a setting to turn bots off), clear bot markers, no bots in ranked, and less inhuman reaction timing would answer a complaint raised by newcomers and veterans alike.
  4. Make cheating easier to report and visibly punished. Players describe auto-parry scripts and teaming in solos but say reporting requires video evidence and goes nowhere, so reporting directly from match replays, with feedback on outcomes, would address both real cheating and the suspicion that skilled players are cheating.
  5. Reform the gacha rather than the game. Players accept cosmetic-only monetization but resent low odds, duplicates, one-time pity and limited-run skins, so duplicate protection, recurring pity, direct purchase of more items and less FOMO would keep spenders from turning into negative reviewers.
  6. Cut patch sizes and fix performance. Repeated 10 to 30 GB updates, stutter on high-end PCs and crashes come up again and again, so delta patching, optional high-resolution cosmetic packs and optimization work on the CPU-bound engine would help both new and returning players.
  7. Settle the anti-cheat question and fix ban appeals. The most upvoted negative reviews are about disabling Windows memory integrity, and a smaller group reports false bans answered by bots, so stating current HVCI compatibility clearly at install and having humans review appeals (especially for hijacked accounts) would address both trust problems.
  8. Teach the hidden mechanics and declutter the menus. Newcomers say the tutorial skips what decides fights and that the lobby buries them in currencies and pop-ups, so in-game lessons on cancels, grapple combos and breaking stun-locks, plus a quieter main menu, would help more of them get past the first few hours.

Also on GameQ