Full ReleasePC

Your Chronicle

Samurai Games · RPG, Indie

Overview

"Let's begin your own story." This is a text-based idle RPG game. There are 1,500+ actions here. It's still growing.

THE GAMEQ VERDICT1,514 reviews analyzed

What players are actually saying

A text idler with a story and reincarnation runs that hook fans, held back by regular tending and poorly explained systems

80% positive on Steam · 2,755 reviews

1. Summary

Your Chronicle is a free, text-only idle RPG, and what its fans praise most often is that the numbers are tied to a story. A third of the longer reviews (34%) talk about the story, and only a small group (under 3%) call it bland, shallow or tropey. Players describe a slow fantasy tale told in tiny dialogue steps, branching choices that lead to several endings, and reincarnation runs that keep your power and open new paths. A quarter of the longer reviews (25%) discuss those endings, replays and the systems under the spreadsheet look, mostly with approval. Some leave it running on a second screen while doing something else, and 10% bring up that it is free.

For an idle game, it asks for a lot of attention. About 10% of the longer reviews say it has to be tended far more than its tags suggest: resources are capped at small amounts, crafting runs through long chains (flowers into wreaths, herbs into medicine into potions into holy water) and real automation arrives only after the first full run. The grind itself splits people. 32% mention it; fans call the slow pace part of the appeal, and critics call it a waste of time. Smaller groups complain about systems the game barely explains, hard progress walls, a cluttered interface, a ruby shop that some find overpriced and others call optional, weak offline progress and lost saves. By the reviewers' own account, it suits patient players who enjoy micromanaging and reading more than anyone hoping to leave it alone in the background.

2. What keeps coming up

What players praise
A story that gives the grind a purposeHigh

34% of the longer reviews discuss the story, and the tone is mostly warm. Players like that quests have reasons behind them: "It's not 'yes I need 2000 cookies' it's more like 'this person is teaching me how to make statues so I need to prove that I can'." Others enjoy the father figure, Norn and the side-quest dialogue, and say the story is why this is the idler they stick with: "with this game I enjoy progressing through the game to see different storylines and try to reach a happy ending for the game". Several fans call the plot generic or cliched but charming, and a few notice clumsy English. Under 3% dismiss the writing outright. Even admirers complain that the story is locked behind Destiny and later Fate, so a single line of dialogue can cost hours of grinding.

Reincarnation runs, multiple endings and hidden depthHigh

25% of the longer reviews discuss the replay structure or the depth of the systems, and most of them like it. Players describe a first run that ends in a reset, permanent bonuses (Sins) carried forward, and each ending unlocking harder paths with new areas, summons and classes. Party building gets credit as a puzzle: summoned monsters give passives that raise resource caps, skills tie into elemental mana pools, and boss fights reward finding the right setup. Some say the plain look hides a complex game that keeps unfolding over many runs. Critics of the structure say the replays repeat too much of the same content and that each ending demands far more grinding than the last.

A low-effort game to run beside other thingsMedium

12% of the longer reviews mention running it in the background, on a second monitor or a weak laptop while working, watching videos or playing something else. "I love having it running in the background, checking up on it once in a while while i do something else." Some keep it open around the clock to avoid the offline penalty, which ties this praise to the offline complaint below.

Free, with a lot to doMedium

10% of the longer reviews bring up that it costs nothing, often as a reason to just try it ("It's legit crazy that an iddle game this good is just free."). A few critics answer that you pay with your time instead.

An addictive pullMedium

7% of the longer reviews describe being hooked, losing track of hours or being unable to close it. Most say this fondly, a few as a warning.

Steady updates and a helpful communityMedium

6% of the longer reviews mention updates and new content, and several thank a developer who stays active on Discord ("The developers listen to the community and are active on discord."). Some players say the wiki, Steam guides and Discord are where they finally learned the game. One veteran complained that new chapters arrive slowly.

Carried over from the browser and mobile versionsLow

4% of the longer reviews come from players who started on Kongregate, Armor Games, Crazy Games or phones and moved to Steam, and one praises the save sync between phone and PC.

Where players are split
Grind and slow pacingHigh

32% of the longer reviews talk about grind or slow progress, and the two camps read it very differently. Some fans call the game very grindy and recommend it anyway, saying the slowness makes each boss kill and level boost feel earned. Critics describe waiting hours for two lines of story and quests that ask for 5, then 10, then 20 of an item; one long review puts it as "Your Chronicle doesn't respect your time." Reviewers on both sides often say the first run is the slowest and the pace eases after the first reincarnation, though some say it slows again in the later areas.

The ruby shopMedium

9% of the longer reviews discuss the premium currency, and they divide. One side says the shop holds basic quality-of-life features such as saved party layouts, extra party slots and shortcut slots, priced so that unlocking everything runs into hundreds of dollars, while free rubies trickle in slowly: "they lock so many basic quality of life features behind a huge paywall". The other side calls it optional and fair: "it's only used for QoL stuff, you can 100% the game without ever getting any and you do get a small but steady supply over time playing". Several fans bought the starter pack just to support the developer. One reviewer warns that purchases were tied to a single save and did not come back after starting over.

Text only, no art or soundMedium

14% of the longer reviews comment on the spreadsheet look. Some love it and say it leaves room for imagination ("The lack of visuals that I mentioned before honestly make things better for me"). Others find it dull ("Having no images on anything in a game in 2023 does make the experience a little dull.") or ask for music. The paid artwork DLC divides people as well: some bought it gladly, and one critic objected to paying for art at all. A few mention the option to upload your own monster pictures as a nice touch.

What frustrates players
An idle game that needs constant attentionHigh

About 10% of the longer reviews say the game is far less idle than its tags suggest, and the complaint turns up much more often in negative reviews than in positive ones. Reviewers get specific: every resource has a low cap, multi-step crafting cannot be queued as a chain, and production stalls once a cap fills if you leave the game alone. "Overall the game needs to pick a lane, either idle or active, this inbetween is whack". Another reviewer describes the middle ground: "everything takes too long to actively play, but inventory limits and limited automation mean you can't do much without being logged in". The crafting chains for statues, holy water and Gluttony food supply many of the examples. One recommending review walks through a quest line where each reward is more storage for the next round: "Turn in my holy water and the reward? More holy water capacity." A few fans who stayed say the Sloth queue and later upgrades fix much of this, but they also warn that you need a lot of active play to get there.

Progress walls and difficulty spikesMedium

13% of the longer reviews describe hitting walls: the Orc and the early forest dungeon for new players, the Bishop quest and the Magic City's Fate costs mid-game, and enemies in the later chronicles that long-time players say jumped by orders of magnitude. "The story is incredible. It demands years of micro managing to read the next part." Some enjoy finally one-shotting a boss that once seemed impossible, others quit at the wall, and one reviewer found enemies that their chosen class could not damage at all.

Systems the game barely explainsMedium

Around 8% of the longer reviews say they did not know what to do next or why something mattered. Players point to a short tutorial, a help menu without search, unexplained terms and choices that permanently lock out content with no warning. "you have to know EXACTLY how to Progress at certain points or you will sit there grinding forever and making no headway". Several recommend reading the Steam guide or wiki before the first run, and some only enjoyed the game after doing so.

A cluttered interfaceMedium

8% of the longer reviews criticise the interface: too many menus and tabs, inconsistent fonts ("Has a god-awful UI, which can't decide on anything"), no Escape key to quit, hotkeys that reset each reincarnation and a story chart you cannot zoom out. A few players ask for a dark mode, while other reviewers mention a dark theme that already exists. People who watch the game on a second monitor also object to the low CPU screen: "the forced low cpu mode when you click off of it for a while i wish there was an option to toggle that happening or not".

Weak offline progressLow

5% of the longer reviews say offline time earns too little, starting at half the online rate and decaying further, so the game only works if left running. "Any idle game that relies on being open 100% of the time is a not recommended from me." A few players run it on a spare machine overnight for this reason.

Lost saves and odd bugsLow

A smaller group reports losing weeks or months of progress after a crash, power cut or cloud sync problem, sometimes with an export file that turned out blank. "expect to make a manual save every hour if you don't want to lose any progress". Others mention gold or resources resetting, a weed appraisal loop flipping back and forth, and achievements that did not register.

Heavy resource use for a text gameLow

4% of the longer reviews complain about CPU and GPU load, fans spinning up, memory growing over days or other games losing frames. These came up most often in 2021. One launch-month reviewer noted that a 60 fps cap and a low CPU mode helped: "After another update that added low cpu mode, the game is running a lot better but still not good enough." Later reviews still mention memory creep during long sessions.

Rough EnglishLow

A few reviews mention typos and awkward translation, from odd names to dialogue that reads strangely. Most treat it as a minor quirk.

3. The player conversation

Reviews run from April 2021 to October 2026 and kept arriving steadily, and the tone is often self-aware. Some of the short reviews are jokes about addiction, spreadsheets and "number go up", and a few negative reviews admit the game hooked them before they gave up. Fans and critics often describe the same caps, chains and waits, then disagree about whether they are worth putting up with.

What people raise depends on how far they got. Players who left within the first few hours mostly say they could not work out what to do, found it boring or slow, or disliked the text-only presentation. Players a few dozen to a few hundred hours in raise the micromanagement complaint: the crafting chains, the low caps, the Orc and forest walls, and the moment they found automation and party slots in the ruby shop. Veterans whose hour counters run into the thousands, much of it idle background time, bring up other problems: the offline penalty, memory creep, lost saves, Fate and Sin grinds, ruby prices for a complete shop and the difficulty of the later chronicles.

The themes stayed stable over time. Complaints about the game straining PCs came up most often in 2021, when the game had just come to Steam, while the not-idle complaint and the grind debate appear in every year. Weekly positive shares move around on small samples but show no lasting slide.

4. What the developers could do

  1. Let players queue multi-step crafting chains and raise early caps. The not-idle complaint is a common reason critics give up, and it centres on chains like herbs to medicine to potions to holy water that stall whenever one cap fills.
  2. Explain systems and warn before permanent choices. Players ask for clearer tooltips, a searchable help menu, a warning before a choice locks out content and a marker for events they have not seen yet, instead of relying on the wiki.
  3. Move core quality-of-life features out of the ruby shop or raise the free ruby rate. Critics single out saved party layouts, party slots and shortcuts as features that should not cost money, and one reviewer lost purchases when a save was reset.
  4. Back up saves automatically. Players who lost weeks or months after a crash or sync failure describe it as the moment they quit, and several only trust manual exports.
  5. Make offline progress closer to online play. Reviewers say the decaying offline rate forces them to leave a PC running all day and night.
  6. Smooth the worst progress walls. The Orc and early forest for new players and the Fate costs and late chronicle bosses for veterans are where reviewers describe stalling for days or weeks.
  7. Tidy the interface. Players ask for a toggle for the low CPU screen, an Escape key to quit, hotkeys that survive reincarnation, a zoomable story chart and a more visible dark theme.
  8. Keep trimming memory and CPU use and do an English pass. Resource complaints were most frequent in 2021, but long-session memory creep and awkward translation still come up.

Also on GameQ