World of Warships
Wargaming.net · Shooter
Overview
Immerse yourself in thrilling naval battles and assemble an armada of over 800 ships from the first half of the 20th century — from stealthy destroyers to gigantic battleships. Change the look of your ship, choose upgrades to suit your play style, and go into battle with other players!
Read moreShow less
Naval warfare has never looked this good! Download World of Warships for FREE and engage in thrilling battles between massive fleets across a multitude of gigantic maps. Every maneuver, salvo, and push can mean the difference between utmost triumph and total defeat!
From the mighty Yamato to the elusive U-190, explore a near-bottomless sea of playstyles aboard historic battleships, destroyers, cruisers, submarines, and aircraft carriers—each faithfully recreated in 3D.
If the life of a lone wolf is not for you, invite your friends to a Division and put your co-operative skills to the test! If you're looking for a real challenge, join a Clan, climb to the top of the Clan league, and strive to be the best on your server!
Plot a course across 13 national Tech Trees and fine-tune your personal approach to naval combat by installing modifications, unlocking skills for your Commanders, and augmenting your fleet’s appearance with camouflages and more cosmetics.
From the game's Steam store page.
THE GAMEQ VERDICT9,998 reviews analyzed
What players are actually saying
1. Summary
World of Warships is a game people love to play and struggle to recommend. Players praise the ships, which are detailed and historically grounded, battles that are slower and more thoughtful than a typical shooter, and a free start. Some reviewers, long-time players included, write that nothing else does naval combat like it.
Money is the complaint raised most. 30% of reasoned reviews talk about monetization: premium ships priced like full games, loot boxes inside loot boxes, time-limited offers and a premium subscription that the high-tier economy seems built around. Carriers and submarines come next, followed by teammates, lopsided matchmaking and power creep that veterans say has sped up. Positive reviews raise these complaints too, sometimes with advice to play free and skip the containers. The positive share has also slipped in each calendar year since 2024.
2. What keeps coming up
What players praise
Gorgeous, detailed historic warshipsHigh
Nothing in the game gets praised more often: 22% of reasoned reviews mention the history, the ship models or the visuals. Players describe collecting real ships from WWI and WWII, learning about them, and seeing them rendered in detail. One reviewer wrote: "The ships look beautiful and you want to spend some time absorbing every detail." The praise turns up in negative reviews as well; a player who does not recommend the game still wrote "The ship models, artwork, and overall presentation are genuinely impressive." Sound and music get occasional praise in the same breath. Purists dissent over ships that were never built (see the anime and fantasy item below).
Slow, tactical combat that rewards thinkingMedium
13% of reasoned reviews talk about tactics, positioning, angling armor or teamwork. Players like that reflexes matter less than reading the map and planning a few minutes ahead; one put it this way: "quick reflexes and aiming accuracy is less important than strategic decision making and positioning." Others call it relaxing, or say the big moments (a perfect salvo, a last-ship win) feel unmatched. Critics of the same pacing say the high tiers turn into long-range sniping and island camping, and some find co-op battles slow to finish.
Plenty of ships, nations and ways to playLow
A smaller group praises the breadth of the game: hundreds of ships, nations with different playstyles, and modes ranging from random battles to ranked, clan battles and PvE. Clan play earns warm words from players who found a regular group. A few positive reviews wish for more maps or modes alongside this praise.
Where players are split
The grind and the credit economyHigh
18% of reasoned reviews discuss the grind, credits or repair costs, and they disagree on whether it is fair. Defenders measure it against similar games: "Compared to other similar games such as World of Tanks or War Thunder the grind is FAR more approachable." Critics describe a wall around tier V or VI, upgrades that cost tens of thousands of experience, and high-tier service costs that eat a match's earnings unless you pay for premium time. One player wrote: "A game you earn 90k credits can cost you 100k credits to service, even without dying." A few reviews add that rewards or the economy were nerfed in later updates.
Pay-to-win or pay-to-skipMedium
Players disagree on whether money buys victory. 8% of reasoned reviews use the phrase "pay to win", while 10% describe playing free, never spending, or the game not being pay-to-win. One defense: "But it's not really pay-to-win. More like pay-to-skip." Players who argue the opposite point to premium and loot-box ships that outclass free tech-tree ships at the same tier, plus paid commander and module advantages for long-time spenders. Some reviews on each side settle in the middle: a free player can build a decent fleet but will be slower and earn less.
Co-op, Operations and asymmetric battlesMedium
8% of reasoned reviews mention the PvE modes. Fans use co-op and Operations to learn, to relax, or to escape random battles; one tip: "Go for COOP mode until you are comfortable then if you choose move to PVP." Asymmetric battles (a few players against a larger bot fleet) have a small but devoted following. The complaints concern how these modes were handled: rewards for asymmetric battles were cut, the mode came and went, Operations maps were rotated out, and bots are accused of dodging the moment you fire or tracking hidden submarines. PvE complaints made up 10% of negative reasoned reviews in 2026, up from 5% in 2024. One 2026 player wrote: "Getting rid of asymmetric battles is the nail in the coffin for me."
Events, dockyards and free giftsMedium
13% of reasoned reviews mention events, dockyards, battle passes or free rewards. Supporters say the game hands out a lot for free; one wrote that "the game throws lots of resources and free premium ships at you every 3-4 weeks." Critics say the events are built around FOMO, need near-daily play, or push you to buy the last steps, and some report specific reward swaps for the worse.
Learning curve for new playersMedium
9% of reasoned reviews discuss what it is like to start. Some say the basics are easy and guides on YouTube get you competent fast. Others describe being matched against veterans in tier VII to VIII ships while still in tier V, mechanics the game never explains, and low tiers filled with bots. A player who does not recommend the game wrote that many mechanics "are not mentioned in the game. Most of these mechanics require you to go online and do some research." A long-time player who does recommend it answered the common warning directly: "lots of reviews say to not play past tier 5. that's because they fight people who know what they're doing, but it's also easy to watch guides and learn the mechanics."
Anime collaborations and fantasy shipsLow
A small share of reviews reacts to collaborations (Azur Lane, Warhammer, Transformers and others) and to ships that never existed or have unusual abilities. Some players enjoy the crossover commanders and events. Others feel they clash with the historical tone, object to fan-service art, or dislike "paper" ships mixed in with real ones; one asked "why mix it with real existing ones?" A lighter request: "please stop changing the banner in the library when you do co-operations with vtubers or animes".
What frustrates players
Prices, loot boxes and constant upsellingHigh
30% of reasoned reviews raise monetization, more than any other complaint, including 40% of negative ones and 22% of positive ones that bring it up as a caveat. The specifics: premium ships costing $100 or more ("You will pay the price of 3 AAA games for a single premium ship"), containers and gacha-style events with low odds, time-limited offers, many overlapping currencies, and a high-tier economy that feels designed around the premium subscription. Loot-box and gambling complaints grew from 6% of negative reasoned reviews in 2024 to 14% in 2025 and 2026. One player put the recent trend in one line: "Every patch the power creep gets worse, premium ships prices just keep going up, loot boxes in loot boxes and the CV/AA rework just keeps getting worse." Some recommending players add the same warning: play free and stay away from the containers.
Aircraft carriers and submarinesHigh
18% of reasoned reviews mention carriers or submarines, including 23% of negative ones. Surface-ship players say carriers spot and strike from a distance with little counterplay, and that submarines can be hard to detect, pin targets with homing torpedoes, and drag out lost matches. One 2024 review opens with "Subs ruin the game", and its author added an edit after trying again in 2026 to say nothing had changed. A minority, often players who enjoy those classes, defends them or asks for better submarine gameplay rather than removal, and some sub players complain about the opposite problem: depth charges and bots that find them too easily.
Teammates, AFK players and toxicityMedium
13% of reasoned reviews complain about other players, including 20% of negative ones: passive teammates who hide behind islands, AFK players, high-tier captains who never learned the basics, and abusive chat. One review says "AFK players and people who deliberately refuse to participate can completely ruin a battle." Some describe the karma and report system being used to punish people. A few others call the community friendly, one of them friendlier than World of Tanks.
Matchmaking and uptieringMedium
8% of reasoned reviews complain about matchmaking, including 13% of negative ones. The specifics: three-tier spreads that leave low-tier ships as fodder ("My T5 ships were constantly getting up tiered to T7 where I was the only T5 in the game"), lopsided divisions, streaks of blowout losses, and teams with uneven access to radar or carriers. A handful of players go further and say outcomes are fixed toward a 50% win rate.
Power creep and overpowered premium shipsMedium
7% of reasoned reviews complain about power creep or overpowered ships, and the complaint grew: from 5% of negative reasoned reviews in 2024 to 8% in 2025 and 11% in 2026. Players name specific paid ships that dominate their tier, and say new releases make older ships, including ones they paid for, less useful. Some tie this directly to the monetization complaint, arguing that balance follows sales.
Bugs, crashes, desync and launcher troubleLow
6% of reasoned reviews report technical problems: crashes, infinite loading screens, disconnects, desync where shells pass through targets and settings that reset; one player's antivirus would not let the game run. Some say they are penalized when a crash drops them from a battle. One player wrote in 2026 that "the desync is so bad my shells go right through enemy ships 80% of the time." Other reviews say the game runs smoothly, even on modest PCs.
Account linking and region lockLow
3% of reasoned reviews deal with accounts. They come mostly from players with few Steam hours, and several explain that their real history sits on the Wargaming launcher. The problems: launching on Steam first creates a fresh account instead of linking an old one, account merges that loop, no way to change server region, and purchases that cannot move between regions. A positive reviewer's warning: "If you open the game without doing that, it creates a whole new account that you have to delete with the help of WoW account services." Some note that linking an existing account became possible later, but the order of steps still trips people up.
Shell dispersion and RNGLow
4% of reasoned reviews complain about accuracy: battleship salvos that scatter around a target, ricochets on flat hits, and the feeling that luck decides close fights. Battleships come up in many of these complaints, sometimes alongside long reload times.
Confusing menus and too many currenciesLow
A small but steady group finds the port screen and economy hard to follow. One recommending player wrote that "The store, mission, quest, event systems are convoluted, easy to get lost in, and not self explanatory". Newer players list the currencies (doubloons, credits, free XP, coal, steel and event tokens) as a reason they felt overwhelmed.
3. The player conversation
Reviews spike every late November around Steam's autumn sale, and those weeks run strongly positive: the weeks starting 25 November 2024 and 24 November 2025 drew 198 and 252 reviews, 93% and 89% positive. Reviews on both sides are often conflicted. Some negative reviewers say they love the game or used to, and some positive ones warn against spending. A number of long-time players frame their review as a decline story ("used to be good").
Praise for the ships, history and visuals comes from players at every stage, including many in their first few dozen hours. Account-linking complaints come mostly from returning players with low Steam hours whose history sits on the Wargaming launcher. Complaints about carriers and submarines, power creep, loot boxes and changes to PvE modes lean toward veterans, and the container and gambling complaints most of all, where players with hundreds of hours wrote a far larger share than they did of the reviews overall. Complaints about uptiering and steamrolling come from both newcomers who hit the tier V and VI wall and veterans frustrated by teammates who never learned.
The positive share fell from 82% for reviews written in April to December 2024, to 79% in 2025 and 72% in 2026. Compared with 2024, the 2026 negatives lean more on loot boxes, power creep and reward cuts in PvE modes, with complaints about specific overpowered premium ships appearing in clusters (including the copy-paste wave in May 2026). Complaints about core balance, the grind and teammates held roughly steady across the period.
4. What the developers could do
- Rein in premium ship prices and loot-box events. Monetization comes up in 40% of negative reasoned reviews, and some players name $100-plus ships, containers inside containers and FOMO offers as the reason they stopped spending or stopped playing.
- Give surface ships real counterplay against carriers and submarines. Carriers and submarines are raised in 23% of negative reasoned reviews, with players describing permanent spotting and hard-to-detect submarines they cannot fight back against.
- Balance new premium ships against the free tech tree before sale. Power-creep complaints more than doubled as a share of negative reviews between 2024 and 2026, and players name specific paid ships that dominate their tier.
- Tighten matchmaking spreads for low-tier and newer players. Players in tier V ships report being dropped into tier VII matches, in one case as the only tier V ship in the game, and say the tiers below are left to bots.
- Restore PvE rewards and keep asymmetric battles and Operations available. Complaints about PvE modes doubled as a share of negative reviews between 2024 and 2026, some from long-time players who say they quit when rewards were cut or the mode was removed.
- Make the high-tier economy and its service costs transparent. Some players say match results show earnings while hiding service costs, and that high-tier ships lose credits without premium time.
- Explain core mechanics in the game. New and long-time players alike say armor angling, spotting and other mechanics are only learnable from outside guides, and that new players struggle without them.
- Fix the Steam account-linking flow and allow region transfers. Returning players lose access to their Wargaming accounts when the Steam client creates a new account first, and others cannot move to a server with playable ping.
