IGTAP: An Incremental Game That's Also a Platformer
Pepper Tango Games · Idler, 2D Platformer, Automation
Overview
Amass an army of clones to follow your tightly-optimised path. Generate massive amounts of power to upgrade your production and movement abilities.
Read moreShow less
IGTAP is an incremental game that's also a platformer - it's in the name! Complete short platforming challenges to earn currency, then spend that currency on upgrades that let you generate even more currency. Unlock new movement abilities that open up both new, higher-income courses and faster routes within old courses. explore the world to find hidden bonuses
From the game's Steam store page.
THE GAMEQ VERDICT443 reviews analyzed
What players are actually saying
1. Summary
Many reviewers say IGTAP pulls off its odd pitch: a tight, Celeste-style precision platformer where your best lap time feeds an idle economy, so getting better at the platforming makes the number go up. They praise the movement, the short courses that get remixed as your abilities grow, and the hidden movement tech. Many came from the popular demo and were happy to find a lot more game behind it. Players who mention the price of about $10 mostly call it good value.
Most of the frustrations sit in the second half. Past the demo's content, the mossy underground area, the climbable upgrade tree and multi-currency prestige loops slowed progression to a crawl for many players. The upgrade that swapped the double jump for an eight-direction "omni-dash" was the design choice reviewers argued about most at launch. The developer patched both within days (omni-dash became a toggle, late-game scaling was eased), and some reviewers then struck out their complaints or switched to a recommendation.
2. What keeps coming up
What players praise
A genre mashup that actually worksHigh
The praise reviewers repeat most is that the concept delivers on its title. Skill drives progression as much as patience: a faster lap raises your income, clones replay your best run, and new abilities send you back to old courses to find faster routes. Some reviewers from outside one of the two genres say it won them over. One opens with "I don't really play platformers," and another writes "Don't play incremental games often, but it felt satisfying to me." Several note that it leans more platformer than incremental, which pleases one camp and disappoints the other (see the split section below).
Tight movement and a deep, Celeste-like tech ceilingHigh
Controls were called tight, responsive and fair, with generous checkpoints keeping the harder courses approachable. Players compare the movement to Celeste, Super Meat Boy and Hollow Knight, and enjoy discovering tricks like dash-jumps, wall bounces and wavedashes that cut seconds off their times. Course design gets specific praise for opening new routes each time your abilities grow. A few found the movement stiff or slightly janky, and one disliked the way the game snaps jumps onto ledges, but praise for the controls is far more common.
A big step up from the demoHigh
About one review in five brings up the demo (19%). Many of those come from demo veterans, some with dozens of hours in it, who say the full game "blows it away" with far more content, new mechanics and surprises. A smaller group felt the opposite ("The demo was half the game," one writes; see content length below), and some wished demo saves carried over or that they could skip the replayed opening courses.
A developer who listened, fastMedium
Reviewers repeatedly praised same-day and next-day hotfixes: the omni-dash toggle, eased late-game scaling, extra dash orbs, softlock fixes, and direct help in the forums and Discord. A few reviews say they switched to a recommendation after these patches or struck through their old complaints, and even some unhappy players cite the responsiveness as a reason for hope.
Strong value at its priceMedium
Most players who mention price call it a steal at around $10 for 8 to 16 hours to reach 100%. A handful disagreed because of the short course list and simple presentation, putting its worth at $3 to $5 or answering "Only yes if it's on sale."
Secrets and surprise twistsMedium
Hidden upgrades, sequence breaks and the way the game keeps changing its rules drew recurring praise. Players liked the metroidvania feel of returning to old areas with new abilities, and several said the game kept surprising them right when they thought they had seen everything.
Runs well on modest hardware and Steam DeckLow
A few players confirmed smooth performance on low-end laptops, Linux and Steam Deck, with small notes about tiny text and muddy dark areas on the Deck screen.
Where players are split
Is it an incremental or a platformer?High
Fans say it is exactly what the title promises and that you can idle or push times as you like. Critics from the incremental side say the idle layer is thin: no real builds, few interesting upgrades beyond movement, no offline progress, and diminishing returns that make shaving half a second off a 30-second lap barely matter. Critics from the platformer side say they had to wait between levels. Most negative reviews from players under 2 hours reject the premise outright, and one sums it up in a line: "buy clones so someone else can be bored for you." Several reviewers noted that the balance shifts across the game: the first half rewards active play, the late game drifts toward idling.
Content length and course countMedium
Supporters found plenty to do over 8 to 16 hours, with courses remixed as your abilities grow. Critics, and some fans, point to the short course list ("There are only 10 courses"), several reused multiple times, and a second half packed into a small area. The ending that rolls partway through let some players down: one calls it a "fakeout end," and another says its congratulations "felt so cheap and fake." Several reviewers asked for more courses, and demo veterans missed the demo's harder B-side challenges.
The mandatory VMAN speedrun modeLow
Late-game progression runs through VMAN, a timed speedrun from scratch where you buy extra seconds. Some loved it as the natural endpoint of the design. Others were annoyed that nothing clearly signals it is mandatory, that it demands advanced tech from players who got this far on patience, and that its pass/fail timer thresholds feel like another wait. One reviewer flagged its name and mechanic as borrowed from IdleOn.
Music, art and atmosphereLow
Some found the minimal art charming ("flash game coded") and the ambient soundtrack calming. Others called it dull grey blocks, near-elevator music and sparse sound effects.
What frustrates players
The second half turns into a slow grindHigh
This is the most common complaint. Players at every playtime raise it, most often those 5 to 15 hours in. Past the demo content, the upgrade tree, prestige resets and extra currencies (atoms, red and purple resources) slowed progress sharply. Players describe leaving the game running for hours or overnight to afford a single upgrade, repeating every course just to trigger timed bonuses, and, in one case, making and eating dinner only to come back and find "the numbers had barely budged." Some say the incremental and platforming halves stop feeding each other; in one long review's words, "Your money can only buy more money." The patch that lowered scaling helped, and one updated review calls the endgame "WAY less grindy," but a slow endgame still came up after it.
Losing the double jump to the omni-dashHigh
The launch-week flashpoint (about 11% of all reviews mention it). A late mandatory upgrade replaced the double jump with an eight-direction dash, wiping out hours of muscle memory right before harder revisited courses. Reviewers called it a punishment and a broken design rule ("Do not take away abilities from the player!"), with some reporting softlocks and missed upgrades they could no longer reach. A minority defended the omni-dash as more powerful and more fun once learned, and the developer quickly made it toggleable. Several reviewers still argued it should be a pure addition, and noted that the late courses were designed around it, so toggling back doesn't fully solve the difficulty spike.
Navigating the upgrade treeMedium
The upgrade station becomes a literal tree spread over many screens, often covered in moss that stops abilities recharging. Players found it tiring to climb back and forth checking which of three currencies can afford which node, easy to lose track of, and hard to plan. Requests for a map, "upgrade ready" markers or a stats page came up several times.
Moss and darkness in the back halfMedium
The mossy surfaces that block ability recharge were called unintuitive and poorly explained, and the shift from a bright lab to dark, dim areas drew complaints about visibility, hard-to-read hazards and, in one review, eye strain. Some missed the bright look from the demo and trailers.
Hidden mechanics with no tutorialMedium
The advanced movement tech, spring behavior, moss rules and some upgrade texts go unexplained. Tech fans enjoyed discovering things, but some players only found them through the Discord or Steam forums, and one fan calls the omni-dash "one of the worst offenders of the abilities with no explanation."
Launch bugs and progress resetsLow
Scattered reports of progress rolling back after quitting, an unwarned point of no return that locked players out of earlier courses, resources or caps resetting between runs, prestige counters bugging out, a controls-breaking bug after relaunch, and clones flickering through teleporters. Several reviewers said fixes arrived quickly.
Controls options and gamepad quirksLow
A small group criticized the lack of key rebinding, gamepad input not switching cleanly from mouse, a controller bug on Linux that zeroed stick input when jumping, and dash on a face button making precise inputs harder.
No accessibility or assist optionsLow
Two players with disabilities asked for help with the harder sequences, and one, who has a hand impairment, holds up Celeste's adjustable difficulty as the standard.
3. The player conversation
The tone is warm and mostly enthusiastic, much of it from demo players who arrived ready to like the game; plenty of the shortest reviews are simple "peak" and "number go up" endorsements. Many recommending reviews carry caveats about the second half, and negative reviews often praise the first half before explaining where the fun stopped. Players who quit early raised different things from those who stayed. Those who left within two hours tended to reject the premise itself (too much waiting, clones doing the fun part), while players 5 to 15 hours in rarely questioned the concept and instead targeted the omni-dash, the grind after the moss area and the upgrade tree.
Complaints about the omni-dash peaked the day after launch, before the hotfix that made it a toggle. After the patches that added the toggle and eased late-game scaling, some reviewers edited their reviews to credit the developer.
4. What the developers could do
- Tighten second-half pacing so the grind stays tied to platforming. The slowdown after the moss area was the most common complaint, and players specifically asked for better times and faster clears to matter more than idle waiting in the late game.
- Make movement upgrades purely additive. Even after the toggle, reviewers argued the omni-dash should sit alongside the double jump rather than replace it; losing a core ability drew more argument than any other design choice at launch.
- Add a map, upgrade-ready markers and a stats page for the upgrade tree. Players described climbing the tree just to check prices and losing track of where boosts come from.
- Add more courses and a post-game challenge tier like the demo's B-sides. The short course list and missing the demo's harder content came up from fans and critics alike, and one fan says they would buy a B-side as paid DLC.
- Teach the movement tech and mechanics in-game. Players leaned on Discord for dash-jumps, moss rules and omni-dash techniques, and one suggested a short tutorial in each level's transition area.
- Improve visibility in the dark areas. Complaints about dim courses and hard-to-read hazards suggest a brightness or lighting option would help.
- Signal points of no return and the mandatory VMAN step. Players were caught off guard by being locked out of earlier areas and by learning late that VMAN is required for progression.
- Add key rebinding and assist options. Missing rebinding, gamepad quirks and a request from a player with a hand impairment point to Celeste-style accessibility settings.






